michael_nielsen

e.g., see my TED talk on emotional engineering of rationality: https://www.ted.com/talks/julia_galef_why_you_think_you_re_right_even_if_you_re_wrong … (title is kinda misleading)

I also agree that for most ppl, accurate beliefs about global issues don't matter much relative to the cost to you personally.

But pursuing accurate beliefs makes sense if either (1) you're personally in a position to affect the world, or (2) you're altruistic.

Seeking true views on global issues is kinda like voting - maybe not worth cost to you personally, but we all lose if ppl think that way

So: Truth is worth cost to you if you can use it to better impact world. If not, it's still a noble act of societal cooperation, like voting

I think you're over-rating accuracy / truth as a primary goal.

I think it's hard to quantify importance, I'm just claiming it IS important (and underrated in general, I guess)

Like, do chickens suffer? Is AI dangerous? Your views on these q's affect whether/how you try to deal w/them. And the right answer MATTERS