Some things, ie submission pipelines, display, commenting etc, will be vastly improved w/exps
-
-
The notion of CS is to make it easy to allow that experimentation to happen...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
...and still have preprints that can be discovered & fit certain standards
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
as defined by an independent, community-driven governance body
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
“independent, community-driven governance body”. Yes. Yes. Yes. It must be owned by community.
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Will it allow the publication of Docker containers?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
They can already be put on
@ZENODO_ORG and cited in the manuscript.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@timohannay pointed this out nicely years ago for the genome project: the paper was a fig leaf.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Agree, but this is a broader cultural problem. We don't review/accredit data
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jessicapolka @michael_nielsen and
Neither do we review/accredit software. Unless a paper has been written about it …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Another sign of how science is stuck in the 1960s, IMNSHO.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.