It'd be more convincing to see a thoughtful list of drawbacks, too. Eg, it creates an effective monopoly, which tends to suppress innovationhttps://twitter.com/NIHDirector/status/831224062760325121 …
-
agree! In terms of real open-science innovation, ironically http://sci-hub.cc/ has been leading the way.
Sort of. Still publishing 1600s-era-style documents, not live, dynamic media.
-
-
100% agree! http://distill.pub/ is making some progress, but it's still at levels
@TheTedNelson would find painful.. -
Nelson seems more focus on relationship between docs/concepts while distill is about interactive but individual docs
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
there is a big push @ Media Lab to publish on PubPub, which is like Medium for papers https://www.pubpub.org/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.