isn't it funny how we used to make fun of this, and actually, it seems pretty tractable: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhF_56SxrGk …
Seeing lots of remarkable work on image enhancement: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00783 pic.twitter.com/RSiscWmEKV
-
-
-
Ken Perlin has a wonderful series on this, starting here: http://blog.kenperlin.com/?p=16060 Ken's always decades ahead...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Great stuff.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
I think this work is quite irresponsible
-
Why? "It could be used to do bad things" is true of almost all tech, so needs to be more nuanced than that.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ha so it's like addressing the fallacy of inferring from American demographics that a family has, grotesquely, 1.14 kids?
-
(where the .14 is like a blurry edge, an impossible interpolation of likely inferences)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Some day we'll finally get to CSI Miami levels of "Enhance"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
strong prior - it "knows what it's looking for".
-
to work for a different class of images it would presumably have to train on a representative sample.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.