Of course this was exactly Vox's founding mission so it's worth considering how that's worked/failed
-
-
Replying to @tophtucker @lisacrost
Vox looks to me like punditry with a data veneer. 538 is much better, and ourworldindata is much better still.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @tophtucker
when you just react to news, like Vox and 538, you'll never explain child mortality & other topics Max covers.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @lisacrost @tophtucker
I like the term "reactive news"! Implies "proactive news", or something like that.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @tophtucker
but Max doesn't work in the news business at all, no? I like the terms, but he's not writing proactive news IMO
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @lisacrost @tophtucker
It's a question of definitions, but at least as I think of it, Max is in the news business.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @tophtucker
so let's go there: how do you define news?
5 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @lisacrost @michael_nielsen
A first rough draft of history's diffs, a symbiosis of entertainment impulses to patch mental models?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Or forget informing: A collective conscious compulsion regenerating a synchronization of cultural identity.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Unrefined raw material, scattered sample of vocab & characters for retroactively finding coherent narratives
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Here I am, explaining why I don't like to provide one definition. A Toph is generating them willy-nilly. I really,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.