The Cochrane Reviews are, somehow, unknown to many people.
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen @patrickc
A sense I've had for > a decade is that the obscurity of my info sources is dropping, even accounting for my changing sources
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
What do you think this means? (I can think of a few plausible causes.)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @patrickc
My most likely guess is a standard world-is-flattening argument. Are you finding the same?
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Not sure but think so. Am definitely finding more people interested in the kind of oddball stuff I am. (Sperber earlier!)
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @patrickc @michael_nielsen
That's a kind of world-becoming-flatter but in a more optimistic way than the homogenizing sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Hard to rank.
@nberpubs,@lambda_ultimate,@Weather_West, http://magic-maths-money.blogspot.com ,@EricAPosner, http://www.arnoldkling.com/blog/ ...2 replies 3 retweets 49 likes -
Replying to @patrickc @michael_nielsen
(Many of those far from obscure in absolute sense, of course, but less followed among people I know...)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @patrickc @michael_nielsen
I'll try to post a proper list at some point; that's off-the-cuff.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Ah, that'd be great to see.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.