@michael_nielsen Do you have questions about science publishing for us?https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/5cvxf7/science_ama_series_can_science_publishing_be_free/ …
-
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen @quantumjournal
Eg, I don't think the lack of a publisher makes http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/ or http://cognitivemedium.com any less valuable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @quantumjournal
To put it another way: do you think http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com & http://cognitivemedium.com less valuable bc not "published"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Not at all, these are great resources. You are at a career stage where you can afford to bypass publishers entirely.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @quantumjournal
They're significantly _better_ because not published, IMO. For one thing, they're interactive. Something like
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/chap4.html can't be published in a conventional journal.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.