http://openreview.net down again. next year they should just use GitHub for paper submissions, or better yet, use http://gitxiv.com
-
-
Replying to @hardmaru
also sucks that you can't open individual submissions in new tabs. What year is this? +1 for Github or Gitlab.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
the benefit of a github submission is that optional supplemental materials like data, code, results, video+audio can be uploaded.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @hardmaru
could create a repo + Github bot: PRs contains author information, bot automerges submission PRs, allows edit PRs from authors.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
A "submission" would be a new folder created in the repo with an AUTHORS.txt, a pdf / tex, possible code or anything else.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If the supervisor bot is well programmed, no human intervention necessary. Question: how would anonymous reviews work?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
in any case, if you need to implement a new process, you can find a simpler and more reliable way than to code your own platform.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fchollet
@michael_nielsen@strife076 I'm sure many options built on top of github are available. People in ML can also volunteer for dev.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The thing that caught my eye about Zenodo was that they worked with GH to do on-platform DOI integration
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.