@Impactstory Curious: do papers on the arXiv not count toward "Open Access"? Reporting 15% OA (it should be > 90%)
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen
arg that's broken! not sure why yet...looking into it. system under heavier-than-avg load for oaweek, may be related.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @our_research @michael_nielsen
yep it is high load on the system. we're still working on it. thanks for your patience and sorry for the error!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @our_research @michael_nielsen
Fixed! Very sorry about that. 84% OA :) https://impactstory.org/u/0000-0002-6188-5389/publications …
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @our_research @michael_nielsen
Did spot checks on the other 16% and don't see obvious missing OA, but if you do, please let us know--helps us get better!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @our_research @impactstory
About half the remainder are OA. Not sure why they're missing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
problem with the first set was related to
@CrossrefOrg API rate limiting. We've contacted them to fix, patch working now.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jasonpriem
Thanks. Fixed a bunch of the remainder. Odd, since they were also (mostly) arXiv papers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
oh you shouldn't have to do that, sorry! we still have some bugs outstanding that we're working on
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
of funny that those don't show up. E.g., http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com , essays linked at http://cognitivemedium.com etc.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.