Is the proposal just to run pagerank with scientists as nodes and their opinions of others' research as weighted links...
A very interesting proposal for how to make science granting decisions: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-016-2110-3 … 1/pic.twitter.com/8p1JSVPJZg
-
-
-
That seems to be the gist, yes.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
expand this to university endowments, too?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
an actual peer prediction mechanism seems much wiser http://yiling.seas.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/fp421-zhang.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aatishb interesting! I've been thinking of a basic-income equivalent for science funding but w/o the redistribution part.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this is massively not incentive compatible... I predict a lot of closed loops in such a system.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting idea. I've been looking at similar approaches for funding related public goods. But who counts as a scientist?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@michael_nielsen This would require dismantling the power structure of research funding. Has anything like that ever happened before?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
a recipe for turning conscious and unconscious biases into financial inequity?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.