Fallows's reporting on the election has been thoughtful & detailed: http://www.theatlantic.com/author/james-fallows/ … Not the usual punditry https://twitter.com/JamesFallows/status/746736269414248448 …
I didn't read it as a general argument. Agree with you that it would have been strengthened by a strong qualifying caveat.
-
-
This reminds me of an Amazon leadership principle I like: "be skeptical when anecdote and data differ."
-
I read Fallows as expressing that skepticism.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.