I just mean: there are two obvious interpretations to your question, one has the answer yes, the other no.
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Yes! Do you think the ambiguity figures in this (to me) mind-blowing pattern? 1/npic.twitter.com/Iv1y7q3Yf0
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cult_cognition
I've no idea. I just know that I don't know (even now) what you meant by the question.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Oh, I see. But the study subjects did. Else noise--not correlations between answers & partisanship & science literacy
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cult_cognition
So depending on which you meant, I could have answered either way...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
would *you* change your answer depending on whether ACS prefix was there? 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cult_cognition @michael_nielsen
There doesn't have to be "right answer" for item to measure influence of political outlooks on information processing! 2/2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cult_cognition
But there does have to be a non-ambiguous interpretation of the question, I think.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
There never is... This is less # 1 of standardized tests ... check this out http://tinyurl.com/mj8vto5
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cult_cognition
The discussion here of that question is, I think, very interesting: https://plus.google.com/+MichaelNielsen/posts/5nMnmCp97hi …
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
Tim Gowers' comments, in particular, are extremely thoughtful (in fact, I think pretty much all the comments are).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.