The "according to climate scientists paradox" (talk summary & slides) http://tinyurl.com/zxlahje #climate #scicommpic.twitter.com/xxUbz5af9b
-
Yes! Do you think the ambiguity figures in this (to me) mind-blowing pattern? 1/npic.twitter.com/Iv1y7q3Yf0
I've no idea. I just know that I don't know (even now) what you meant by the question.
-
-
Oh, I see. But the study subjects did. Else noise--not correlations between answers & partisanship & science literacy
-
So depending on which you meant, I could have answered either way...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I get point on ambiguity. But IPCC 5th describes nuclear power generation as not contributing; I'm sure you get why
-
we *could* say solar "contributes" too & wind but then everything does; ambiguity is there but not very Gricean!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.