@Singularitarian what about the recent image recognition results
@Shedletsky For ImageNet top-5 criterion. This doesn't correspond to any particularly interesting human criterion.
-
-
@michael_nielsen but it is better than the author was able to do with the same criterion. Whether it is interesting or not is besides the pt -
@Shedletsky The claim "better-than-human vision" is simply incorrect, for definitions of "vision" that humans care about.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.