@mykola The idea of packing assets to reduce risk, & thus providing money to poor people to buy houses is a good one.
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen@mykola Sometimes I think all we need is to redefine $0 to mean, the number that affords health care, food, shelter, edu.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen@mykola I didn't know that, but I understand it was also mooted by Nixon.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mathpunk
@mathpunk@michael_nielsen huh. It's not an irrational idea, the way it sounds under capitalist ideology (broken record here, sorry).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mykola
@mykola@michael_nielsen I have other ideas, thoughts, schemes, but UBI as "capitalism up to affine transformation" seems small & possible2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen@mykola Please blog about this. If it's too weird you can anonymously guest on mine :)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mathpunk
@mathpunk@mykola I wrote a short note years ago: http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/non-abelian-money/ … More development since, tho, I shld really write down what I know3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen@mykola Wealth-dependent pricing for, say, water, certainly makes sense. Make "fair" into a multiplicative statement.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen@mathpunk eh, but the wealthy can opt out of that - so the baseline isn't being set. Seems like a mismatch.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.