@michael_nielsen IMHO AI-risk args typically overest. curr. machine intelligence & underest. human intelligence & thus how far AI has to go
That last tweet encapsulates almost every arg I've heard about AI risk. I like option 3: we don't know much, maybe AI a risk, maybe not 2/
-
-
-
@MelMitchell1 That seems like an e.g. of arg style 1. I don't disagree with your premise, but it has little bearing on whether AI is a risk - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@michael_nielsen But if there's a risk that AI is a risk then AI is a risk, right? -
@DN_Debatt_betyg You're using "risk" in a slightly different way than I did. (I agree with your point, just being clear.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@michael_nielsen the argument I've heard is AI is far from achieving anything genuinely dangerous, so no point don't worrying (yet). -
@michael_nielsen but philosophically I don't see how this gets AI researchers off the hook if the goal is still human-level intelligence. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.