“Look, there are casualties whenever you try to change reality, and you can’t get too sentimental about it in some ways.” –– Stewart Brand
-
-
Replying to @devonzuegel
@devonzuegel Not sure I agree with that. You can be compassionate, empathetic, & also determined to make change.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen Agreed that compassion is critical (to be more effective & to minimize damage), but it can't overwhelm necessary change2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @devonzuegel
@devonzuegel A concrete example is farm subsidies: Should these be unilaterally(!) removed in one swoop? I think doing so is cruel.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen Good example. Probably not, but more bc it would be less effective (greater shock to entire system) than a tapered approach1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @devonzuegel
@devonzuegel I think another reason is compassion to the people involved. If s'one's farmed 30 years, don't just destroy their life.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen You have to weigh that w the cost of subsidizing American agribusiness to system as a whole, say Argentinian wheat farmers2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @devonzuegel
@michael_nielsen Unfortunately the consequences of these decisions don't live in a vacuum, affecting just the group you have your eye on
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@devonzuegel I was talking about all affected, including farmers elsewhere, consumers, ppl who can't afford to eat (since subsidies...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.