What do you think of mainstream press reporting on preprints?
-
-
Replying to @michaelhoffman
@michaelhoffman I'm just about to give a comment to a journalist on a recent preprint from another lab2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tuuliel
@tuuliel@michaelhoffman Natural and inevitable. No imperative to respond, though.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen@michaelhoffman Reporting on preprints that haven't been peer-reviewed without peer comments is very dangerous2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @tuuliel
@tuuliel@michaelhoffman In a tiny minority of cases. Not "very dangerous" for the great majority of papers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen@michaelhoffman Depends on the tone. Should be transparent that paper not (necessarily) vetted by anyone except the authors1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@tuuliel @michaelhoffman Sure. Until pretty recently, this was true of most papers. Peer review phased in between 1930-1970, roughly.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.