What do you think of mainstream press reporting on preprints?
-
@michael_nielsen@michaelhoffman Reporting on preprints that haven't been peer-reviewed without peer comments is very dangerous
@tuuliel @michaelhoffman In a tiny minority of cases. Not "very dangerous" for the great majority of papers.
-
-
@michael_nielsen@michaelhoffman Depends on the tone. Should be transparent that paper not (necessarily) vetted by anyone except the authors -
@tuuliel@michaelhoffman Sure. Until pretty recently, this was true of most papers. Peer review phased in between 1930-1970, roughly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.