1/ Since everyone's talking about ad blocking: I'd love to know how people on either side of the debate decide where to draw the line.
-
@michael_nielsen (Implicit argument made for yes: https://twitter.com/benedictevans/status/644680131739435008 ….)
@patrickc So "Ad blocking means the people whose content you read make less money than if you don't use an ad blocker".
-
-
@michael_nielsen So, yes, but I think that falls short of moral imperative. Deciding to not subscribe also costs publisher money. -
@patrickc That's an unreasonable imposition on individual freedom. Consumers have no responsibility to make s'one else's business model work - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.