@michael_nielsen I like this insight. AI = "life" in 1700s (in need of further elaboration / delimitation)
https://books.google.com/books?id=y3Kk-CACSxIC&pg=PA5&lpg=PA5&dq=%22It+is+true+that+I+mistrust+the+notion+of+human+nature+a+little,+and+for+the+following+reason:+I+believe+that+of+the+concepts%22&source=bl&ots=7NS1oaf52c&sig=KjMy9II8GE943a0Tw1Nv9SDUpvg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAWoVChMInueBjd75xgIVA6WICh17wgD8#v=onepage&q&f=false …
A few thoughts on whether deep learning will soon lead to artificial intelligence: http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/chap6.html#AI
-
-
-
@rauchg I'd never seen that. Chomsky on postmodernism is interesting: http://mindfulpleasures.blogspot.ca/2011/01/noam-chomsky-on-derrida-foucault-lacan.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@michael_nielsen great essay! Have you seen varied topological approaches for general learning? h/t@rauchg -
New conversation -
-
-
@michael_nielsen thanks so much for sharing. Just added it here: http://rbl.ms/1LM0UrYThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michael_nielsen I think the 'tools' questions are 2ry to the 'capabilities' one. I've watched the trajectory for 20+ years, and it is steepThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.