My request for "examples of people who frequently and approvingly link to strong positions contrary to their own" got 0 replies. Telling 1/2
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen it's a great Q, still thinking. Phaps should have a hashtag for Q & examples of.#otherviews,#altview ?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @tmccormick
@tmccormick I've found it dispiriting how few examples I can think of.@tylercowen actually has a nice related post:http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2012/01/krugmans-response-to-alex.html …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen:@pmarca known for engaging widely, phaps not contrarywise. tho. Is this something eg network analysis might surface?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tmccormick
@tmccormick The contrast with Cowen is striking: he seems interested in finding both strong pro- and anti-Piketty analyses.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen on#heterophily/#dissensus, & how we might build heterophily metrics for research, people, groupings http://tjm.org/2013/02/03/steering-between-incivility-and-insularity/ …4 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @tmccormick
.
@michael_nielsen btw my thoughts about#heterophily also informed by your excellent book Reinventing Discovery http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0691160198 …3 replies 2 retweets 3 likes
@tmccormick Thanks! Admittedly, in my book I put parts of the problem in the "too-hard" basket. Cognitive diversity is most
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.