2/ Every research paper should be capable of winning the Nobel? Every book the Pulitzer? Every movie an Oscar (or 300mm at BO)?
-
-
Replying to @bhatiani
@bhatiani@pmarca This is Richard Hamming's point. (From the Best Talk Ever, http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html ….)pic.twitter.com/mL3uOOQqPr
3 replies 16 retweets 36 likes -
Replying to @patrickc
@patrickc@bhatiani There's a super-interesting bit in the same essay where H makes v. nearly the opposite point 1/2pic.twitter.com/sB2DqGHEst
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen@bhatiani Yeah, that's a good point. So how does one reconcile the two pieces of advice?3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@patrickc@bhatiani Feynman's question: "How to use computers to simulate physics?" is maybe a nice prototype for a good "little problem"3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen@bhatiani Aside, but I'm amazed Feynman doesn't get more credit/fame for his progress on this little question...4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@patrickc @bhatiani He does in the physics community (today, not at the time!). It's actually his most cited paper: http://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=B7vSqZsAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.