I wonder when computer-generated articles will get peer-reviewed & published, not as a prank, but for actually producing novel/good results.
-
-
Replying to @scott_bot
@scott_bot@michael_nielsen you mean human-reviewed, or computer-reviewed? ;)computers are not yet our peers.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @pepijndevos
@pepijndevos@michael_nielsen Good question! My guess is computer-written will succeed long before computer-reviewed.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scott_bot
.
@scott_bot@pepijndevos Having a simple testing API wld be a step toward computer-reviewed. Eg should be possible to run "make" on a paper1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen@scott_bot@pepijndevos Sounds like beginning of a creation story. “Paper: submitted. Subject: Cosmology. Run make. <BANG>”1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mcnees
@mcnees@scott_bot@pepijndevos "Why does my paper about the big crunch always fail to build?"3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@mcnees @scott_bot @pepijndevos Seriously, part of the idea behind http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/chap4.html was that instead of _describing_ a neural net, 1/2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.