This seems to be just what great literature can do for us: make us sympathetic to, if not comfortable with moral uncertainties/ambiguities. And be wary of easy certainties offered by say, religion or politics. In this sense I find it aligned in essence to scientific enterprise.
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Such a great subject, emphasizing our biases, and their distortions/influences on the material we create. It's so hard (and yet so valuable) to write clearly on stuff we really do not understand, or are totally conflicted on.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I can't help thinking that reading about science may have been more helpful. In science, it's crucial to understand the limits of what is known, but it is also important to recognize rubbish.
-
What's this got to do with the passage I quoted? They were journalism students, most likely writing about the humanities, and having trouble being comfortable writing about issues where they didn't feel moral certainty.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Perhaps exacerbated in the siloing echo chambers of modern times in which, in addition to having epistemic uncertainty because they are novice, they are not forced to confront the aleatoric uncertainty intrinsic to many moral dilemmas.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I really like the text. What is the source?
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.