The problems are interlocking: political unpopularity, security (country A doesn’t want country B to use nuclear power, because it can be used for weapons), cost (in part due to regulations, politics, & security), waste, and more.
-
-
5. Final thoughts: I’m repeatedly struck by the incredible size of the opportunity here. We’re going to make much better institutions, discover many amazing things, & create incredible companies.
Prikaži ovu nit -
I know some people don’t like the last, but think it’s good when groups of people profit from providing an enormous social good, like scalable clean energy, or carbon removal. That's capitalism operating as it should, to serve the social good. I hope it does here.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Of course, the flip side: there’s damage already being done, and likely to be incredible damage done.
Prikaži ovu nit -
We don’t yet have institutions or norms that enable us to deal with problems where inaction over the next few decades may cause much of an ice sheet to melt a century or two from now. I hope we can develop such institutions and norms!
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
@Climeworks have an interesting approach: direct air capture, currently selling to companies who use CO2 industrially (e.g. Coca-Cola) to scale up -
I would be curious to know how much they're selling it for. My guess is it may make for an R&D subsidy, but certainly isn't economic, but I don't know. (BTW, I love this: https://climeworks.shop/?utm_source=CW-Website&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=teaser8 … )
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Who *is* investing in this area right now?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.