Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce michael_nielsen
michael_nielsen
michael_nielsen
michael_nielsen
@michael_nielsen

Tweets

michael_nielsen

@michael_nielsen

Searching for the numinous. Co-purveyor of https://quantum.country/ 

San Francisco, CA
michaelnielsen.org
Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2008.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    1. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      1. Renewable energy is growing like absolute gangbusters

      1 proslijeđeni tweet 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    2. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      According to BP's Statistical Review of World Energy, in 2018 renewable electricity grew 14.5%. For comparison, CO2 emissions from energy use (the vast majority of CO2 emissions) grew just 2.0% https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2019-full-report.pdf …pic.twitter.com/4vFInZ2YM1

      1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    3. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Not to belabour the obvious, but that’s a humungous difference! Renewable energy is expanding at an incredible rate. But in terms of overall energy use, it’s still just a tiny, tiny fraction. The tiny (top) sliver of orange here is renewables.pic.twitter.com/XMCrMxJYNW

      6 proslijeđenih tweetova 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    4. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      It’s tempting to look at that sliver & feel pessimistic. On the other hand, ask Blockbuster how that tiny (but rapidly growing) upstart Netflix did. Compound growth is an incredibly strong force. That’s especially true when many govts are strongly supporting renewables

      1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    5. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      This growth is being supported by many trends. One is the amazing drop of solar prices (Swanson’s Law): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swanson%27s_law …. More than a factor 200 over 40 years, in constant dollars.pic.twitter.com/P2AMz91dQl

      1 reply 4 proslijeđena tweeta 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    6. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Incidentally, this is a fun paper about _why_ prices have dropped so rapidly. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56afb881e321406be6160228/t/5bff10822b6a2884d7267f17/1543442566890/Evaluating+the+causes+of+cost+reduction+in+photovoltaic+modules …pic.twitter.com/zetlwDSxYN

      19 proslijeđenih tweetova 85 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    7. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Battery prices show a similarly incredible drop. They’re down by a factor 7 since 2010, from $1,100/kWh in 2010, to $156/kWh in 2019:https://www.utilitydive.com/news/battery-prices-fall-nearly-50-in-3-years-spurring-more-electrification-b/568363/ …

      1 reply 16 proslijeđenih tweetova 44 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    8. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Something I don’t understand are the price points at which solar + battery ought to take over most of the electricity system. I don’t think we can be terribly far from that point - 10 years? I don’t have a good model, nor of how centralized it will be.

      6 replies 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    9. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      (Also: I’d like to better understand the environmental impact of batteries and solar. Lithium ion batteries seem to be pretty nasty stuff.)

      8 replies 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    10. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      In any case: there are incredibly strong forces driving renewable growth.

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
      michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      At the moment, 6 of the world’s 10 largest companies (by revenue) are oil and gas companies. 2 are car companies, still mostly fossil fuels. And 1 is an electricity company, almost certainly mostly fossil fuels.pic.twitter.com/7pEoYIpaBD

      13:12 - 29. pro 2019.
      • 3 proslijeđena tweeta
      • 14 oznaka „sviđa mi se”
      • Yog Mehta Lazy Bot Shital Shah JManuel Josh Herritz Lori Ziolkowski yo soy fetch Frank Pasquale Ian Hines
      3 proslijeđena tweeta 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        1. Novi razgovor
        2. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          My guess - this is just speculation - in 30-40 years time many of those fossil fuel companies will have been replaced on that list by either renewable energy or (maybe) nuclear companies. Or they themselves will have largely switched. Volkswagen is certainly in that mix.

          1 proslijeđeni tweet 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        3. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Incidentally, when I talk to tech folks they sometimes tell me climate/energy is a niche, interesting but obviously much less important than tech. See all the tech companies on that list above? Neither do I.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 27 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        4. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          It’s true that by market cap tech is currently larger. But energy is a multi-trillion dollar industry. And the growth of renewables suggests a major transition in energy is near.

          1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        5. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          (Just to be clear: I'm not saying tech isn't incredibly important! Just that there's a myopia on the part of some tech people I've chatted with about this. There's a very large world beyond technology.)

          6 replies 1 proslijeđeni tweet 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        6. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          2. But hang on, aren’t capitalism and growth models the problem? Why are you talking about all this growth? Isn’t it a bad thing?

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        7. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          This argument basically says climate change is just a symptom of a much more unhealthy pattern: growth models. Capitalism produces growth produces more human ability to change the world. And that means goof-ups produce more damage to the world.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        8. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          I’m somewhat sympathetic to this argument. Certainly, and just as a for instance, battery waste really is something I worry about, if we’re all of a sudden using 100x the scale of batteries.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        9. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          And you do see this pattern over & over. Subprime mortgage derivatives seem, in principle, a great idea - pooling risk to provide capital to people who otherwise can’t afford homes. Except they were systematically mispriced, resulting...

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        10. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          ... not just in the evaporation of trillions of dollars during the financial crisis, but huge followon effects that have massively changed the world.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        11. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Sometimes we find technological solutions to these problems. The original refrigerators used ammonia as a coolant. This sometimes leaked, killing people. Solution! Use CFCs instead. Except that damaged the ozone layer. Solution! Use HCFCs instead. And so on.

          1 proslijeđeni tweet 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        12. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Maybe tomorrow some magic genie will produce a way of doing scalable direct air carbon capture at 10 cents per tonne of CO2. If so, we can be back down to pre-industrial CO2 levels in a flash, if we choose.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        13. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          The pessimistic view is that we keep playing with fire, & sometimes we get lucky. But eventually humanity will damage ourselves in a way that makes the financial crisis look like a rounding error. Maybe climate is it. But even if not...

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        14. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          ... capitalism & growth models have this as an inevitable side effect. They’re the real culprits.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        15. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          The trouble with this point of view is that the alternatives seem far worse. Yes, you can go for a low-growth or communist model. I’m sure the Amish CO2 emissions are much lower than middle America. North Korea’s are 1.6 t / yr, one tenth of the US per capita, one third of global

          1 proslijeđeni tweet 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        16. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          But I don’t want to live in North Korea, & I suspect most of the “down with capitalism” crowd don’t either.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        17. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          (Of course, they don’t think of it that way. But whenever I’ve dug down into concrete plans, they seem poorly thought through, relying on wishful thinking and “this time will be different”.)

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        18. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Now, the optimistic point of view here - the opportunity! - is to try to find smart and wise alternatives that are much better than capitalism’s current incarnation. That really is an exciting opportunity.

          2 proslijeđena tweeta 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        19. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          That’s one reason I’m enthused by charter cities. It’s why I’m enthused by the ideas of Elinor Ostrom. And by the liberal radicalism (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3243656 … ) of @VitalikButerin @zhitzig @glenweyl, a clever way of funding public goods and attacking collective action problems

          8 proslijeđenih tweetova 56 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        20. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          I don’t mean to say I think liberal radicalism etc are likely to solve climate change! I just mean: this kind of thinking & work seems tremendously important, & worth supporting more experimentation in this direction. Reinventing capitalism will sound ludicrous until its not.

          1 proslijeđeni tweet 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        21. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          (The more conservative approach - probably more likely to work, in this context - is to make a small modification capitalism by introducing something like a carbon tax. I may say more about that later, but I’ll leave it aside for now.)

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        22. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          3. What about nuclear? I haven’t said much about nuclear (fission). That’s because, while in principle it ought to be an enormous help, there’s a set of problems with it that I just don’t know much about how to solve.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        23. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Between 1950 and the 1980s nuclear grew rapidly, from 0 GW to more than 300 GW of installed capacity. And then it levelled off, in the aftermath of Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. It’s only 400 GW today, and provides about 10% of world electricity.

          1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        24. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          The problems are interlocking: political unpopularity, security (country A doesn’t want country B to use nuclear power, because it can be used for weapons), cost (in part due to regulations, politics, & security), waste, and more.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        25. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Worse, there’s a cadre of people who like to shout loudly “nuclear is the only possible answer, and if you don’t think so you’re an idiot” (or the equivalent). These are not the people you want on your side in a battle for hearts and minds.

          2 proslijeđena tweeta 20 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        26. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          I don’t know how to solve the problems above. I believe, however, that they genuinely _are_ soluble, and what’s needed is the right kind of marketing and political and entrepreneurial geniuses (genii?).

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        27. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Actually, that's a little silly to say ("genius" can be such a discouraging word!) But: hard work and imagination may well go a long way. I'd like to learn more about the best ideas people have here! How to solve the unpopularity? Regulatory? Security? And so on!

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        28. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          4. A bit of a time out. Looking back at the above, it’s been a blizzard of facts and figures and charts.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        29. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          What I really want (& I think many other people want) is a compelling overall narrative arc. And I don’t quite see that. I know a lot of people are prescribing narrative arcs for climate (“X is the answer!”) But I must admit I haven't been very compelled by what I've seen.

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 18 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        30. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          Anyways, failing an overall solution, I believe what you need to do is bite off sizeable chunks of the problem, build up your understanding. That’s what I’ve been trying to do in this thread, at least for myself!

          0 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        31. michael_nielsen‏ @michael_nielsen 29. pro 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet

          4. Negative emissions technologies are essential CO2 likely (ordinarily) takes centuries to be removed from the atmosphere. Even if we went to zero emissions tomorrow, it’d keep getting warmer due to climate inertia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_inertia …

          1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
          Prikaži ovu nit
        32. Još 8 drugih odgovora

      Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

      Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

        Sponzorirani tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • O Twitteru
        • Centar za pomoć
        • Uvjeti
        • Pravila o privatnosti
        • Imprint
        • Kolačići
        • Informacije o oglasima