You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
A famous Silicon designer once told me "all speed comes from parallelism" & power efficiency as well. Clock speed by itself can be a VERY deceptive measure. Power usage increases linearly with parallelism, but exponentially with clockrate. Speed increases linearly with both.
That's been true for 10+ years, since clock speeds have largely saturated. It's quite certain that much of the speed increase between 1980 and 2010 came from clock speed increase (itself enabled by other things, e.g., smaller feature sizes, as I understand it).
How much could be enabled by faster clock-rates vs parallelism? Photo/video/audio, ML/ CV, AR/VR seem mostly about parallelism. Increases in parallel compute for AI has been mind-boggling. Beyond what I'd dream for clockrates. Faster clocks could make faster Javascript... Hmmm...
Well, personally I've believed since the 80s that parallelism will win in the end. But I've been repeatedly too optimistic (i.e., flat wrong) about how rapidly that will happen.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
