You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
To make the question clearer: it'd be good to understand the relative percentage contribution of microbial respiration versus fire versus human use vs [etc].
My searches haven't yielded an answer, but I'm sure it's been estimated. I have a bad feeling I've seen the estimate, & forgotten it...
Depends a great deal on what ecosystem you're talking about. Review paper focusing on temperate forests here: https://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/pubs/jrnl/2015/nrs_2015_russell_001.pdf …
Often overlooked aspect and important part is the volume of water the tree holds
I'm reasonably confident the answer lies somewhere in Smil's excellent book "The Earth's Biosphere". Worth checking chapters 7 & 8 if you have a copy handy...
You should've ankified that!
Some decay bacteria produce methane (CH4), which is a much more potent greenhouse gas. Probably better to burn the dead trees than let them rot.
It depends what you do with the tree: if you burn the wood, if it disappears in a swamp or if it is stored elsewhere. If you burn it, then obviously O2 is consumed and CO2 produced. You can even make charcoal from it.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
