What's your favorite illustration of the usefulness of complex numbers?
-
-
I enjoyed this article by Scott Aaronson on what the implications would be if probability amplitudes were reals or quaternions instead: https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=4021
-
E.g., faster than light signalling with quaternionic QM
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's a statement on how basic they are. "Complex" and "imaginary" are huge misnomers (unlike quaternions from "four"). They're good captivating learners but are bad at describing what is going on conceptually. They don't have to do with complexity. Maybe Duogonal numbers?
-
This makes more sense
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Absolutely agreed, though I have to add that Feynman made a point to show that complex numbers were in no way necessary to qm, they just made it more convenient.
-
"Complex" numbers are a basic tool. A normed division algebra over the field of real numbers. Blame Gauss for coming up with the horrible name.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cheeky hbar = 1 there
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can we say something about calculations on these numbers?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't that going little bit too far though? Quantum mechanics does explain lot of stuff, but claiming that every thought that anyone's had involves complex number, too far. It's like claiming that universe evolves unitarily. You can predict, but cannot claim!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.