You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
To whatever extent specialized language offers a usable proxy for specialization, do you have an intuition as to whether jargon leads or lags substantive progress? And how you might identify when specialization is impeding progress?
On the first question: in healthy fields it seems coeval. In more fake fields it can all be theatre. I'm sure specialization always "impedes" progress, for suitable definition of impedes.
That seems right on the first question. On the second, in case it isn't clear, I just mean jargon descriptively, i.e. as "specialized language". To the extent that this would be associated with new techniques or abstractions, it's less obvious to me that it _always_ impedes.
Oh I see, if you see impedes as "add friction to" it would always. That seems true.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
