Easy take: calling linear algebra “quantum physics” and “artificial intelligence” is hype. Deeper: the huge influx of physicists into AI has produced an intellectual monoculture that isn’t capable of addressing key problems in the field.https://twitter.com/WIRED/status/1181437300414275584 …
-
-
Not sure I follow; what is the relevant difference between this formulation and what I said? I was suggesting that physicists mostly only draw on methods and analogies from physics, and (useful as those are) they aren't able to address many of the key problems in AI.
-
Oh, that's not how I interpreted your tweet at all. It read (to me) as you asserting that the monoculture in AI is due to physicists. I guess not!
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hopfield networks, Boltzmann machines, renormalization group explanations of machine learning models - I'm glad all these things are being explored, although I have low confidence any will turn out to be on the critical path to AI.
-
Is the point here that these are diverse intellectual traditions, although all based in physical analogies? (I suspect I'm not seeing where you are pointing)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
We have inadequate frameworks for understanding how knowledge is created. It should be no surprise that we can't figure out how to create a generalized AI. I write about knowledge structures and their creation. Here's an intro.https://empathy.guru/2019/04/06/what-is-structural-memetics-and-why-does-it-matter/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.