It's shocking to me how much easier it is to read CS/science papers from the 50s-70s, vs. papers today. Turing 1950 is one of the most important papers *in human history* and it reads like a blog post.
-
Papers that cite 2+ papers that have never been citied together in same paper aren't citied as much initially, but after 5+ years end up with more total citations.
That's not true either, although there is work showing a (small but significant) trend along those lines. I have mentioned a couple of variants of that work to @nayafia.
-
-
Apologies. I got from David Epstein's new book, 'Range:'pic.twitter.com/Ebyic31OJz
-
I think this might've been what I was thinking of....fuzzy brain distorting facts obtained :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.