I think it is a little weird how much we spend in the primary relative to the general, but in the aggregate, these are small amounts of money when *who the president is* is at stake:https://twitter.com/Taniel/status/1180341797433888768 …
-
-
Military and foreign policy decisions seem obviously high-stakes, but tracing economic growth impacts in such a small sample is obviously hard. I've tweeted a number of papers looking at outcomes for *state* partisan control and mostly not finding much FWIW.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.