"A proof that the Navier-Stokes equations are computationally universal" (I believe Terry Tao has a proof for a stripped down version)
-
Or, what kind of explanation are you looking for? The book talks about the evolution of sleep, and it's functional role, what else is missing?
One that's convincing. Unlike the half dozen or more I've previously read about the evolution of sleep and its functional role.
-
-
Can you link me to the previous ones and why they are not convincing?
-
I'm in a slightly odd spot here. I feel a little as though I've commented that astrology isn't all that convincing, and someone now wants a list of what I've read about astrology (a fair number of tidbits, over my life, but it was all bad, so I don't remember any titles);
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.