Many researcher thought that you need better quality gates and qubits in order to achieve quantum error correction or quantum supremacy. The new paper claims to achieve qs with current qubit/gates quality but I don't find the paper convincing.
Scott Aaronson with a good FAQ on quantum supremacy: https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=4317
Some remarks from @GilKalai, questioning details of the (accidentally released early) paper:https://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2019/09/23/quantum-computers-amazing-progress-google-ibm-and-extraordinary-but-probably-false-supremacy-claims-google/ …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Something for
@SciTech_Cat ?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pontificator Professor Aaronson has made Kalai out to be *the* official QC skeptic/pundit of
@GoogleAI's#QuantumComputing supremacy experiment, but Kalai hasn't tweeted since. Let's see if this thread will get Kalai to tweet something to rebuttal... -
(a)I'll play a role of a Kalai assistant QC skeptic: Prof Aaronson's
#QuantumComputing supremacy FAQ blog offers many options for QC skeptics to launch attacks e.g., - 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Momentous! Maybe twenty more years and we get general purpose QCs with a million+ qubits?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@samukiya I would like to know if quantum technology will solve online criminal supremacy in remote sensing. These criminals could bring the world to a standstill in 3 minutes, if quantum technology fails to curb these menaces and used for counter intelligence.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.