michael_nielsen

PG. I think before YC, before startups felt as part of the zeitgeist to people around me, his writing was a massive breath of fresh air to see the world as mutable. It also put the programmer on a pedestal, which always felt powerful. There’s also a cleanliness to his writing.

The other person obviously is Fitzgerald. I think most people have read Gatsby in High School, but between his short stories and non-fiction (not even mentioning his other actual books), Fitzgerald has an assassin-like ability to pick the perfect word at the perfect time.

Writing (and design) have the very interesting property that huge effort + talent make the writing _appear_ easier. And outsiders often think that means the writing process must have been easier for the writer, when the opposite was true.

MJ versus LeBron: I know what you mean. For me, LeBron looks like massive force applied to a problem. MJ is smoother (though still incredibly forceful). It's a bit like Federer vs Nadal.

In most sports, looking at clips from the 80s it's obvious today's top athletes would be much better. But after a brief period to adapt, MJ would clearly just destroy the modern NBA, same as in his own time. Otherworldly.

It’s exactly that, I think about this in a lot of things. People can be great, but how does it look? That look can often make you feel a certain way. Like Westbrook vs Harden is similar too. I Harden in that he looks slow and smooth, but is unguardable.https://twitter.com/udayrsingh/status/1119845590194692097?s=21 …

I can see Harden is amazingly skilled, but find his foul-oriented game a real turnoff. I'd much rather watch Steph or LBJ or Westbrook or Giannis or KD. Westbrook is so fun to watch, even when he's playing in a way that's arguably bad for his team.