Wonderful thoughtful article on open source funding, by @feross. We're in an unfortunate state where many companies rely heavily on open source to extract sizeable profits (which in general I am fine with, TBC), but the people writing open source often struggle (this seems bad)https://twitter.com/feross/status/1166924812129722368 …
-
-
This comment here points to a massive, massive failure of the invisible hand.pic.twitter.com/vwpAJ96XXH
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm likely missing a lot of nuance coming from a finance background, but an "automated downtime unless a pre-announced funding target is reached" along with "high profile recognition of donaters" looks like it should work?
-
The likely outcome is abandonment of any such packages by the big cos that use them, destroying one of the main types of value open source creates.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think it's accidental that open source authors capture so little of the value they create.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Here's a passing thought I've been having. What if we have a service where we donate $10 per month and we can decide what % of it goes to what maintainers. You can change the percentages at any time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
cc
@TrackingActions/ congrats on a great tool
I'd echo the sentiment expressed already - only add that if you don't need the funding there's likely other channels that do where you could pay it forward with the same big picture/sci dev. goals in mind.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.