It's a bit of a generic laundry list. The most interesting bit to me (if I hadn't heard nice things via friends-of-friends!) would be the bit about history and anthropology, juxtaposed with the tech. But there's nothing unique in the bio.
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Thanks, I appreciate it. It was my first pass, honestly reflects the subjects I think about most often, trying to give people an easy way to slot me into their pattern recognition...
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @WilliamAEden
I'm sure for lots of people that's great. But at least for me I'm often happiest finding people who I have a hard time slotting into my pattern recognition. Not all, of course, but a lot.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @WilliamAEden
Difficult to write that without it sounding like it's a bit pretentious or self-righteous. But I think it's really just a personality characteristic, not something consciously chosen.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
No, not pretentious at all, I really like that kind of person too, just not sure how to signal it in 280 characters yet. When I see an uninformative bio I basically just disregard it and look at tweets or other context to decide. Hmmm.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @WilliamAEden
Well, for me, "The secure transport of light" or "Fallibilist. Optimist" etc are at least 10x "Worked with Thiel on VC". I know (a) this person is an original; and (b) I have some genuine overlap in interests with them.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @WilliamAEden
For me, "Searching for the numinous" really sums up a lot of my life, in a way that's meaningful to me. And a surprising number of friendships have started with someone saying that they'd seen my bio, loved it, and they were, in some measure, doing the same with their life.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
Thanks, this is interesting, I will definitely give my bio some more thought. Maybe I should steal from my old OKCupid profile
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @WilliamAEden
michael_nielsen Retweeted michael_nielsen
Probably true :-) I think it was
@KevinAKwok who described Twitter as tapping a tuning fork and seeing who resonates. More here:https://twitter.com/michael_nielsen/status/975884635535101952 …michael_nielsen added,
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
(I will also say: personally, at least, I enjoy it when people put their spouse in their bio. Again, it's an individualizing thing. One of the joys of social media, for me, is getting to know some of my friends' family at least a tiny bit.)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
(Over)thinking more about this. Within 5 miles of where I'm sitting there's probably 100,000 people who'd like to work with Thiel on VC. But almost no-one who'd incorporate "The secure transport of life" into their presentation of self. So the latter is more informative, to me.
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen @kevinakwok
Oh, sure, but the set of people who *have worked with him* is smaller. I was riffing off of some of the other comments: it’s not about engagement, it’s about validation. I’ve had people tell me the number one reason they took me seriously is because Thiel picked me to work with.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @WilliamAEden @kevinakwok
If your main interest is what selection filters people have passed, this is good. But if it's what unusual desires they have, it's useless. I'm much more interested in the second. But other people are, of course, very different in their taste.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.