. @stripe's commitment on carbon sequestration. I hope a lot more companies start to do this: https://stripe.com/gb/blog/negative-emissions-commitment …pic.twitter.com/PAU81izx9L
Show this thread
-
What argument are you referring to?
I must admit, almost every negative or no-go argument I've ever heard about quantum computing turned out to be wrong. Including, in some cases, me disproving arguments I'd made. Which is the right kind of egg one wants to have on face. But it's made me skeptical of skeptics.
-
-
(Of course, fusion is a nice countering example. But maybe that's more an example of why it's bad to put too many of your eggs in one basket.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For the record, I’m extremely bullish on DAC, and would love to see more investment there. I just don’t think we need $10/tCO2 CDR, and don’t want to see us wait to start deploying it. DAC+EOR is cheaper today than LCFS+45q, so we should be deploying it, not just R&Ding it.
-
Of course not - I just think the number is interesting because it's the right ballpark for rough parity with the costs of the Clean Air Act.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.