Upon reflection, this is a surprisingly deep game. In some sense, we become what we pay attention to; answers to this question begin to imply a kind of conviction in certain of our interests.https://twitter.com/DRMacIver/status/1161620775964696576 …
-
-
It's a tough racket, quotes.https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2011/04/08/familiar-misquotations …
-
My instinct is toward the point of view you espouse. As antidote, I occasionally remind myself of Drucker's pov, that concern with sources is a social construct (to support the reputation economy in academia), & largely irrelevant, unless you want to participate in that economy
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Good old Greeks. You likely know this Will Durant one, riffing on Aristotle: “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.” (1/2)
-
I like the interaction with the Epictetus one: Attention is important for [much of] what we choose to do. But what we repeatedly don’t pay attention to shapes us just as much. (2/2)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Attention is all we need?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sources are important, because if the sources are old and have survived, that's a signal for quality / usefulness over time
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.