Who in the world has super taste, a feel for and way of picking subjects that, decades in the future, will seem prescient, as though they had a line on the future?
-
Show this thread
-
Some examples: the late Marvin Minsky's utterly extraordinary list of students and collaborators: https://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/people.html … (from Ivan Sutherland to Terry Winograd to Eric Drexler to...)
2 replies 0 retweets 37 likesShow this thread -
Murray Gell-Mann's extraordinary list of proteges include Ken Wilson, John Schwartz, Jim Hartle, and, in a way, the whole Santa Fe Institute.
1 reply 1 retweet 25 likesShow this thread -
Stewart Brand saw so much early: Engelbart & human augmentation; the Merry Pranksters, Ken Kesey; the population bomb (he worked with Ehrlich); Xerox PARC; the Well (one of the first online communities); the Whole Earth Catalog; and so much else: http://sb.longnow.org/SB_homepage/Home.html …
1 reply 1 retweet 23 likesShow this thread -
More people: I can make a case for George Church, Jane Jacobs, Eric Drexler, and many others. In each case they saw multiple things, often in (supposedly) unconnected disciplines, decades ahead of the mainstream.
1 reply 0 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
Who else can you think of? What did they see, decades before almost everyone else?
8 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @michael_nielsen
“If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders.” —Hal Abelson
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Ah, Abelson is a great example! He was importantly right about Papert, GPL, Creative Commons, open science, Scheme, open source biology, and a dozen other things. Amazing taste!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.