Who in the world has super taste, a feel for and way of picking subjects that, decades in the future, will seem prescient, as though they had a line on the future?
Show this thread
-
Stewart Brand saw so much early: Engelbart & human augmentation; the Merry Pranksters, Ken Kesey; the population bomb (he worked with Ehrlich); Xerox PARC; the Well (one of the first online communities); the Whole Earth Catalog; and so much else: http://sb.longnow.org/SB_homepage/Home.html …
Show this thread
More people: I can make a case for George Church, Jane Jacobs, Eric Drexler, and many others. In each case they saw multiple things, often in (supposedly) unconnected disciplines, decades ahead of the mainstream.
-
-
Who else can you think of? What did they see, decades before almost everyone else?
Show this thread -
More good examples: John Wheeler, Hal Abelson (suggested by
@mhartl ).Show this thread -
Just a clarification: I mean people who are right over and over again. Not just that they founded a field, but rather that they were a key enabler in the early days of many, many fields. Eg, Minsky's proteges helped found perhaps a dozen or more distinct fields or subfields.
Show this thread -
To reiterate: lots of people are mentioning field founders. Which is great, but not the question. The question is: who helped enable new fields to emerge, over & over & over & over again. Eg, I can name a dozen fields or subfields for Minsky.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.