Who in the world has super taste, a feel for and way of picking subjects that, decades in the future, will seem prescient, as though they had a line on the future?
Show this thread
-
Murray Gell-Mann's extraordinary list of proteges include Ken Wilson, John Schwartz, Jim Hartle, and, in a way, the whole Santa Fe Institute.
Show this thread
Stewart Brand saw so much early: Engelbart & human augmentation; the Merry Pranksters, Ken Kesey; the population bomb (he worked with Ehrlich); Xerox PARC; the Well (one of the first online communities); the Whole Earth Catalog; and so much else: http://sb.longnow.org/SB_homepage/Home.html …
-
-
More people: I can make a case for George Church, Jane Jacobs, Eric Drexler, and many others. In each case they saw multiple things, often in (supposedly) unconnected disciplines, decades ahead of the mainstream.
Show this thread -
Who else can you think of? What did they see, decades before almost everyone else?
Show this thread -
More good examples: John Wheeler, Hal Abelson (suggested by
@mhartl ).Show this thread -
Just a clarification: I mean people who are right over and over again. Not just that they founded a field, but rather that they were a key enabler in the early days of many, many fields. Eg, Minsky's proteges helped found perhaps a dozen or more distinct fields or subfields.
Show this thread -
To reiterate: lots of people are mentioning field founders. Which is great, but not the question. The question is: who helped enable new fields to emerge, over & over & over & over again. Eg, I can name a dozen fields or subfields for Minsky.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.