Imagine DeepNudes were known to be 99% predictive* of what people actually look like nude. *Meaning, if judges are shown a mix of real photos of someone nude, & DeepNudes, they can't tell the difference In such a world, would it be unethical to publish DeepNudes of someone?
-
Seems like this logic could justify any mass privacy violation (publish everyone's emails, set up cameras in their homes, broadcast thoughts, etc)
David Brin's book "The Transparent Society" accepts that logic and explores the consequences of a society without privacy. It's old - mid-90s - but I enjoyed the exploration.
