Here's the actual cumulative review time, rising roughly linearly (as we'd expect) with the number of repetitions.pic.twitter.com/GcbN9tjGoU
Show this thread
-
(Someone running a citizen science project once told me they had a small stream of transgressive users - people who were completely ignoring the point of the project, and "doing things wrong" for their own delight.)
Show this thread
Another fun tidbit: by repetition 5, almost everyone is getting 90+% of the questions right. It'd be nice to also better understand (a) what's happening for the other users; and (b) how honest people feel they are being (and actually are)?pic.twitter.com/HNm1t1WPph
-
-
It just occurred to me that by strongly encouraging people to engage in transgressive uses, we're putting determined contrarians in a bind. To be transgressive they need to do exactly as we ask
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm curious if the same questions are right/wrong by all people of if everyone gets different questions wrong
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I sometimes grade myself as "correct" for mostly correct answers, but I tend to be very honest to myself and the review process. I have read both qcfvc and the quantum search pages and am looking forward to my next review session. In fact, it's one of the 1st things to look for!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.