Alas. Framing human decisions as responses to incentives is another harmful effect of utilitarianism, Bayesianism and utility theory in economics.https://twitter.com/MatjazLeonardis/status/1141070593149853696 …
-
-
Replying to @DavidDeutschOxf
Human decisions often really are responses to incentives (sometimes mainly, sometimes in part). But having that as the _only_ way of thinking about them is a terrible model.
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @DavidDeutschOxf
I once had a conversation with an economist who was extremely puzzled about why people "volunteered free labor" to write Wikipedia articles. She had a lot to say about the costs, and wanted to think about reputational benefits etc.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @DavidDeutschOxf
I asked why she thought people played soccer in the park on the weekend, "volunteering free labor" to do so. And she started to talk about reputational benefits from friends watching etc. I proposed that maybe it might be "fun", but this was not considered plausible...
4 replies 4 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @michael_nielsen @DavidDeutschOxf
I wrote the above with a little snark, which I really don't like in myself. But that was one immensely frustrating conversation.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Thanks, I appreciate that. What bugs me: snark too easily turns into cynicism or pessimism, or just plain lording it over others. I'm expressing genuine frustration in my tweets, but it's with an absent person. That's a pattern to beware of.
-
-
Replying to @michael_nielsen @DavidDeutschOxf
Yeah I probably like the snark in you as a way of feeling better about my own toxic excesses.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.