michael_nielsen

Thinking: The leaders who run Silicon Valley, while focused, tend to be generalists. They're T-shaped, but not *the* domain expert. If true, why don't specialists run SV? Maybe: generalists can convene across disciplines & networks—bridging capital, talent, & opportunity.

I like this question when contrasted with: why is it specialists who make the greatest intellectual & creative leaps? Historically, people like Einstein, Darwin, Newton, Picasso, etc. Still mostly true, though small teams are becoming more common in breakthrough conceptual work

A fair number of people are replying with the assertion that Einstein et al were really generalists. I doubt this is true in the way Erik originally meant his tweet. Darwin spent ~decade writing a treatise on snails. Such a person would not be considered a generalist in SV.

The key point: each knew far more about particular very narrow topics than anyone else in the world, and that was the source of their advantage. This seems relatively rarely true of SV generalists (except about their network; in some sense, that's their specialty).

A lot of people making the mistake in the tweet below: https://twitter.com/resolvingdust/status/1139687833835204608 … Einstein was a pretty good amateur musician, a pretty good mathematician, a largely ineffective activist... and one of the two greatest theoretical physicists in the history of the human species.