Thinking: The leaders who run Silicon Valley, while focused, tend to be generalists. They're T-shaped, but not *the* domain expert. If true, why don't specialists run SV? Maybe: generalists can convene across disciplines & networks—bridging capital, talent, & opportunity.
-
-
A lot of people making the mistake in the tweet below: https://twitter.com/resolvingdust/status/1139687833835204608 … Einstein was a pretty good amateur musician, a pretty good mathematician, a largely ineffective activist... and one of the two greatest theoretical physicists in the history of the human species.
This Tweet is unavailable. -
As a musician he seems to have been at the level of a good local tennis player; as a mathematician, at the level of a top local pro; as a theoretical physicist he was much better than a Roger Federer type. The gap is enormous.
-
He certainly did get a lot from his breadth of interests. Eg his strength as a mathematician helped in general relativity. But there's a letter somewhere where Hilbert laments that "every boy in Goettingen" (roughly) knew more about the mathematics than E, but E discovered GR
-
So, at least as I'd use the term, he was a mind-bogglingly talented specialist who benefited a lot from having other interests at which he was pretty darned good, but certainly not nearly the best in the world.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think there might be two kinds of people who call themselves generalists. First kind is people who are good at communicating across disciplines and building a network. Second, ironically, is people who have such a specific interest that no existing group fully buys into it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.