You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Most, perhaps even all, of those things will happen if and only if people want them to.
What a great (implied) set of questions! Just how much contingency is there in the futures in this (class of) video? What human choices would make it really radically different?
I think there's a fun set of ideas for video games here. Something that bugs me about many "open world" games is that they superficially seem to offer you freedom, but really trap you inside a fairly boring finite state machine.
It's like "Choose Your Own Adventure". Locally, the text can be pretty rich. But globally you know your inside what is usually a rather dull structure.
But if the design choices humanity makes are affecting things like whether the universe ultimately suffers heat death or not... that's exciting, and makes the finite state machine have intrinsically interesting stakes associated to the choices.
In this view, the video as is is a bit like @flantz's "Universal Paperclips" game, where there is (basically) one inevitable future for the Universe; a single state machine. It's wonderful and terrible. But it's a fun design challenge to imagine broadening that state machine
Choose to be God or be dead. Asimov already answered the last question.
Mainly the choices we can't predict getting to make.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
